Christopher Rommell McKinney v. the State of Texas
This text of Christopher Rommell McKinney v. the State of Texas (Christopher Rommell McKinney v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order entered April 27, 2021
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-20-00100-CR
CHRISTOPHER ROMMELL MCKINNEY, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F19-75306-M
ORDER
After the Court granted several extensions of time, appellant’s brief was due
on March 31, 2021. To date, no brief or motion has been filed, and we have had no
other communication regarding this appeal.
We ORDER the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why
appellant’s brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make
appropriate findings and recommendations and determine whether appellant
desires to prosecute this appeal, whether appellant has abandoned the appeal, or whether appointed counsel has abandoned the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b).
If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the trial court
shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d
708 (Tex. App.–Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent,
the trial court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure
effective representation, which may include appointment of new counsel.
We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which
shall include written findings and recommendations, to this Court within
TWENTY DAYS of the date of this order.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable Ernest
White, Presiding Judge, 194th Judicial District Court; to Valencia Bush; and to the
Dallas County District Attorney’s Office, Appellate Division.
This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above
order. The appeal shall be reinstated twenty days from the date of this order or
when the Court finds it appropriate to do so.
/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Christopher Rommell McKinney v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christopher-rommell-mckinney-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2021.