Christopher Rogers v. State
This text of Christopher Rogers v. State (Christopher Rogers v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order entered July 31, 2018
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-00250-CR No. 05-18-00251-CR
CHRISTOPHER ROGERS, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 204th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. F17-34648-Q & F16-55015-Q
ORDER Appellant’s brief was due June 13, 2018. When it was not filed, we notified appellant by
postcard dated June 15, 2018, and instructed him to file his brief and a motion to extend time to
file the brief by June 25, 2018. To date, no brief or motion has been filed, and we have had no
communication from appellant.
Therefore, we ORDER the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s
brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and
recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute these appeals or whether
appellant has abandoned the appeals. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b). If the trial court cannot obtain
appellant’s presence at the hearing, the trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d 708 (Tex. App.–Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per
curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be
necessary to assure effective representation, which may include appointment of new counsel.
We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include
written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this
order.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send a copy of this order to the Honorable Tammy Kemp,
Presiding Judge, 204th Judicial District Court; to counsel John Tatum; and to the Dallas County
District Attorney.
These appeals are ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The
appeals shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are
received, whichever is earlier
/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Christopher Rogers v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christopher-rogers-v-state-texapp-2018.