Christopher Rogers v. Amy Rogers
This text of Christopher Rogers v. Amy Rogers (Christopher Rogers v. Amy Rogers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 16, 2013
NO. 03-13-00010-CV
Christopher Rogers, Appellant
v.
Amy Rogers, Appellee
APPEAL FROM 126TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND FIELD DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE PEMBERTON
IT APPEARING to this Court that the appellant has neither paid, nor made arrangements to pay
for the clerk’s record; has not submitted a status report regarding this appeal, and, accordingly,
has failed to prosecute the appeal: IT IS THEREFORE considered, adjudged and ordered that
the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. IT IS FURTHER ordered that the appellant
pay all costs relating to this appeal both in this Court and the court below; and that this decision
be certified below for observance.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Christopher Rogers v. Amy Rogers, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christopher-rogers-v-amy-rogers-texapp-2013.