Christopher Paul Christianson v. Kay Le Farmer and Douglas Scott

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 26, 2025
Docket01-24-00993-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Christopher Paul Christianson v. Kay Le Farmer and Douglas Scott (Christopher Paul Christianson v. Kay Le Farmer and Douglas Scott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Christopher Paul Christianson v. Kay Le Farmer and Douglas Scott, (Tex. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

Opinion issued June 26, 2025

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-24-00993-CV ——————————— CHRISTOPHER PAUL CHRISTIANSON, Appellant V. KAY LE FARMER AND DOUGLAS SCOTT, Appellees

On Appeal from the 387th District Court Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 13-DCV-209827

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Christopher Paul Christianson, has filed an unopposed motion for

voluntary dismissal of this appeal.1 No other party has filed a notice of appeal, and

1 Although appellant’s motion initially requested dismissal “without prejudice,” at the Court’s request, appellant subsequently filed a letter stating that he seeks to dismiss the appeal absent the “without prejudice” language. no opinion has issued. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), (c).

Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P.

42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f). We dismiss any other pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Adams and Justices Caughey and Johnson.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Christopher Paul Christianson v. Kay Le Farmer and Douglas Scott, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christopher-paul-christianson-v-kay-le-farmer-and-douglas-scott-texapp-2025.