CHRISTOPHER PAKURIS and VERONICA PAKURIS v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
This text of CHRISTOPHER PAKURIS and VERONICA PAKURIS v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY (CHRISTOPHER PAKURIS and VERONICA PAKURIS v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
CHRISTOPHER PAKURIS and VERONICA PAKURIS, Appellants,
v.
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.
No. 4D19-3066
[January 7, 2021]
Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County; William L. Roby, Judge; L.T. Case No. 432013001730CAAXMX.
William N. Swift of William N. Swift, P.A., Palm City, and Jennifer S. Carroll of the Law Offices of Jennifer S. Carroll, P.A., Jupiter, for appellants.
Warren B. Kwavnick of Cooney Trybus Kwavnick Peets, PLC, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
WARNER, CONNER and FORST, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
CHRISTOPHER PAKURIS and VERONICA PAKURIS v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christopher-pakuris-and-veronica-pakuris-v-state-farm-mutual-automobile-fladistctapp-2021.