Christopher Oden v. Eric D. Wilson

688 F. App'x 227
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 5, 2017
Docket16-7680
StatusUnpublished

This text of 688 F. App'x 227 (Christopher Oden v. Eric D. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Christopher Oden v. Eric D. Wilson, 688 F. App'x 227 (4th Cir. 2017).

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Christopher William Oden, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition and denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. * We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Oden v. Wilson, No. 3:15-cv-00196-JAG-RCY, 2016 WL 183469, 2016 WL 6634883 (E.D. Va. Jan. 11, 2016 & Nov. 8, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

We have construed Oden's March 9, 2016 motion for a certificate of appealability as a timely notice of appeal from the district court's order denying his § 2241 petition. See Marmolejo v. United States, 196 F.3d 377, 378 (2d Cir. 1999) (holding that motion for certificate of appealability should be treated as notice of appeal).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Domingo Marmolejo v. United States
196 F.3d 377 (Second Circuit, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
688 F. App'x 227, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christopher-oden-v-eric-d-wilson-ca4-2017.