Christopher Napier v. State
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS §
CHRISTOPHER NAPIER, § No. 08-18-00050-CR
Appellant, § Appeal from the
v. § 243rd District Court
THE STATE OF TEXAS, § of El Paso County, Texas
State. § (TC# 20170D04503)
§ ORDER
In its certification of the defendant’s right to appeal, the trial court indicated that “this is a
plea bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” The Rules of Appellate Procedure
require us to dismiss this appeal unless we find that the certification is defective. See
TEX.R.APP.P. 25.2(d); Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 613 (Tex.Crim.App. 2005). After
reviewing the responses of the parties and the record, we conclude that the trial court did not
follow the plea bargain between the parties and what began as a negotiated plea was converted to
an open plea. As a result, the waiver of the right to appeal executed by Appellant is
unenforceable. We conclude that the certification entered by the trial court is defective because
it is not supported by the record.
Accordingly, we abate the appeal and remand the cause to the trial court to enter a new
certification of the defendant’s right to appeal. Given that Appellant has already been advised of
1 his rights to appeal and to file a petition for discretionary review, the trial court is not required to
obtain Appellant’s signature on the certification. The trial court shall file the new certification
with the trial court clerk no later than July 24, 2018. The trial court clerk shall prepare and file a
supplemental clerk’s record containing the new certification of the defendant’s right to appeal no
later than August 3, 2018.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 9th day of July, 2018.
PER CURIAM
Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Christopher Napier v. State (Christopher Napier v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.