Christopher McCloskey v. Bank of America; Mary McCloskey and T. Rowe Price;Vangaurd

Opinion

Opinion issued October 17, 2024

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

their differences in t[wo] suits . . . [including] [trial] cause number 23-DCV-306843,

the subject of this appeal.”

No other party has filed a notice of appeal, and no opinion has issued. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2), (c). Further, although appellant’s motion does not

include a certificate of conference stating that appellant conferred or made a

reasonable attempt to confer with appellee, Mary McCloskey, regarding the relief

requested in the motion, more than ten days have passed, and appellee has not

expressed opposition to appellant’s motion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.1(a)(5), 10.3(a).

Accordingly, the Court grants appellant’s motion and dismisses the appeal.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2), 43.2(f). We dismiss all other pending motions as

moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Adams and Justices Hightower and Countiss.

Footnotes

1. NO. 01-23-00811-CV ——————————— CHRISTOPHER MCCLOSKEY, Appellant V. MARY MCCLOSKEY, Appellee On Appeal from the 240th District Court Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 23-DCV-306843 MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Christopher McCloskey, proceeding pro se, has filed a “Motion to Withdraw Appeal,” asserting that “[p]ursuant to an enforce[d] [Mediated Settlement Agreement], the parties . . . have reached an agreement to compromise and settle