Christopher Martin v. Jonathan Shafer
This text of Christopher Martin v. Jonathan Shafer (Christopher Martin v. Jonathan Shafer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-25-00605-CV ___________________________
CHRISTOPHER MARTIN, Appellant
V.
JONATHAN SHAFER, Appellee
On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 1 Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 2025-007598-1
Before Sudderth, C.J.; Kerr and Birdwell, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT
Appellant’s brief was due on March 13, 2026, but he did not file a brief by that
date. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a).
On March 24, 2026 and April 16, 2026, we warned Appellant that we could
dismiss his appeal for want of prosecution unless, within ten days, he filed a brief and
an accompanying motion reasonably explaining the brief’s untimeliness. See Tex. R.
App. P. 10.5(b)(1), 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). More than ten days have passed, and we have
not received a response.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App.
P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).
Per Curiam
Delivered: May 21, 2026
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Christopher Martin v. Jonathan Shafer, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christopher-martin-v-jonathan-shafer-txctapp2-2026.