Christopher Martin McClendon v. Jennifer Hintzel McClendon

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 23, 2014·No. 01-13-00935-CV·Published

Opinion

Opinion issued January 23, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-13-00935-CV ——————————— CHRISTOPHER MARTIN MCCLENDON, Appellant V. JENNIFER HINTZEL MCCLENDON, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law Austin County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2011L-5345

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Christopher Martin McClendon, has neither paid the required fees

nor established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5,

20.1; see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.941(a), 101.041 (West 2013);

Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket

No. 07-9138 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2007), reprinted in TEX. R. APP. P. app. A § B(1).

Further, appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay the fee for preparing

the clerk’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). After being notified that this

appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 5; 42.3(b), (c).

We dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees and for want of

prosecution. We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Higley, and Sharp.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Christopher Martin McClendon v. Jennifer Hintzel McClendon, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Christopher Martin McClendon v. Jennifer Hintzel McClendon (Christopher Martin McClendon v. Jennifer Hintzel McClendon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.