Christopher Martin McClendon v. Jennifer Hintzel McClendon
Opinion
Opinion issued January 23, 2014
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-13-00935-CV ——————————— CHRISTOPHER MARTIN MCCLENDON, Appellant V. JENNIFER HINTZEL MCCLENDON, Appellee
On Appeal from the County Court at Law Austin County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2011L-5345
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Christopher Martin McClendon, has neither paid the required fees
nor established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5,
20.1; see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.941(a), 101.041 (West 2013);
Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket
No. 07-9138 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2007), reprinted in TEX. R. APP. P. app. A § B(1).
Further, appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay the fee for preparing
the clerk’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). After being notified that this
appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. See TEX. R.
APP. P. 5; 42.3(b), (c).
We dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees and for want of
prosecution. We dismiss any pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Higley, and Sharp.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Christopher Martin McClendon v. Jennifer Hintzel McClendon (Christopher Martin McClendon v. Jennifer Hintzel McClendon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.