Christopher Madaio v. Tyler Roden
This text of 375 F. App'x 921 (Christopher Madaio v. Tyler Roden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant Christopher Madaio appeals the district court’s order, dated March 31, 2008(1) granting summary judgment to the appellee FBI on Madaio’s claims for money damages for violations of the Privacy Protection Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000aa et seq.; *922 (2) denying Madaio’s motion in limine and motion for more discovery; and (3) striking certain affidavits. Appellant Madaio also appeals the district court’s order, dated July 7, 2008, denying Madaio’s motion to alter or amend the judgment. After oral argument and review, this Court affirms finding no reversible error.
Nothing herein shall affect Madaio’s lights to seek return of any legal property from the FBI under Rule 41(g) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure or as otherwise permitted under law.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
375 F. App'x 921, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christopher-madaio-v-tyler-roden-ca11-2010.