Christopher Lynn Cantrell v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 19, 2014
Docket11-14-00337-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Christopher Lynn Cantrell v. State (Christopher Lynn Cantrell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Christopher Lynn Cantrell v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

Opinion filed December 19, 2014

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals ___________

No. 11-14-00337-CR ___________

CHRISTOPHER LYNN CANTRELL, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 35th District Court Brown County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CR22691

MEMORANDUM OPINION Christopher Lynn Cantrell, Appellant, filed an untimely notice of appeal from his conviction for the offense of aggravated sexual assault of an elderly person. We dismiss the appeal. The documents on file in this case indicate that Appellant’s sentence was imposed on September 26, 2014, and that his notice of appeal was filed in the district clerk’s office on November 10, 2014. When the appeal was filed in this court, we notified Appellant by letter that the notice of appeal appeared to be untimely. We requested that Appellant respond and show grounds to continue this appeal. 1 We also informed him that the appeal may be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Pursuant to TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2, Appellant’s notice of appeal was due to be filed within thirty days after the date that his sentence was imposed in open court, not thirty days after the date that the trial court signed the judgment of conviction. See Rodarte v. State, 860 S.W.2d 108 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993). A notice of appeal must be in writing and filed with the clerk of the trial court. TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(c)(1). Appellant’s notice of appeal was filed with the clerk of the trial court forty-five days after his sentence was imposed and was, therefore, untimely. Furthermore, Appellant did not file a timely motion for extension. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3(b). Absent a timely filed notice of appeal or the granting of a timely motion for extension of time, we do not have jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998); Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996); Rodarte, 860 S.W.2d at 110. Because we have no jurisdiction, we must dismiss the appeal. This appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

December 19, 2014 Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). Panel consists of: Wright, C.J., Willson, J., and Bailey, J.

1 Appellant has since sent this court a courtesy copy of an application for writ of habeas corpus in which he is seeking permission to file an out-of-time appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rodarte v. State
860 S.W.2d 108 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1993)
Slaton v. State
981 S.W.2d 208 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1998)
Olivo v. State
918 S.W.2d 519 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Christopher Lynn Cantrell v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christopher-lynn-cantrell-v-state-texapp-2014.