Christopher Lee Paynter v. State of Texas
This text of Christopher Lee Paynter v. State of Texas (Christopher Lee Paynter v. State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Following a guilty plea, appellant Christopher Lee Paynter was adjudged guilty by the district court of injury to a child. The court assessed punishment at imprisonment for fifteen years.
The clerk's record contains a written waiver of appeal signed by appellant and his attorney. This document, which reflects a knowing and voluntary waiver of the right to appeal, was signed on the day sentence was imposed in open court. A defendant who knowingly and intelligently waives his right to appeal may not thereafter appeal without the consent of the trial court. Ex parte Dickey, 543 S.W.2d 99 (Tex. Crim. App. 1976); see also Hurd v. State, 548 S.W.2d 388 (Tex. Crim. App. 1977); Reed v. State, 516 S.W.2d 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974). There is nothing in the record to indicate that appellant sought or obtained the permission of the trial court to pursue this appeal.
The appeal is dismissed.
Before Chief Justice Aboussie, B. A. Smith and Yeakel
Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction
Filed: December 16, 1999
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Christopher Lee Paynter v. State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christopher-lee-paynter-v-state-of-texas-texapp-1999.