Christopher Lee Cole v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 5, 2015
Docket05-14-01398-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Christopher Lee Cole v. State (Christopher Lee Cole v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Christopher Lee Cole v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

Order entered February 3, 2015

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-01398-CR No. 05-14-01399-CR

CHRISTOPHER LEE COLE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 6 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. F13-53515-X, F13-53516-X

ORDER Appellant’s brief is overdue in these appeals. We also note that the clerk’s records do not

contain the trial court’s certifications of appellant’s right to appeal. Accordingly, we ORDER

the trial court to prepare certifications of appellant’s right to appeal for each of these cases that

accurately reflect the trial court proceedings. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a), (d); Cortez v. State,

420 S.W.3d 803 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013).

We further ORDER the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s

brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and

recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeals, whether

appellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeals. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the

trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d 708

(Tex. App.–Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is

ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which

may include appointment of new counsel.

We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include

written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this

order. We further ORDER that the supplemental records contain the trial court’s completed

certifications of appellant’s right to appeal.

The appeals are ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The

appeals shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are

received, whichever is earlier.

/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Meza v. State
742 S.W.2d 708 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1987)
Cortez, Damien Hernandez
420 S.W.3d 803 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Christopher Lee Cole v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christopher-lee-cole-v-state-texapp-2015.