Christopher Lee Amerson v. Doctor Bradford

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided June 26, 2025·No. 25-11489·Unpublished

Opinion

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

In the

United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

No. 25-11489

Non-Argument Calendar

CHRISTOPHER LEE AMERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus DOCTOR BRADFORD, MACON SP WARDEN, DEPUTY WARDEN OF MACON STATE PRISON, JOHN DOE, Medical Director, WILLIAMS, et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

2 Opinion of the Court 25-11489

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia D.C. Docket No. 5:23-cv-00268-MTT-CHW

Before JILL PRYOR, GRANT, and BRASHER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdiction . Christopher Amerson appeals from the district court’s April 8, 2025, order denying his construed motion for reconsideration of the court’s order dismissing his claims brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against several defendants. Neither order is final and appealable , however, because the district court did not dismiss Amerson’s deliberate indifference claim against defendant Bradford, which remains pending, or include a Rule 54(b) certification that would permit us to consider its order of dismissal as a final and appealable judgment. See 28 U.S.C. § 1291; Supreme Fuels Trading FZE v. Sargeant, 689 F.3d 1244, 1246 (11th Cir. 2012) (noting that an order that disposes of fewer than all claims against all parties to an action is not immediately appealable absent certification pursuant to Rule 54(b)).

No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all other applicable rules.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Christopher Lee Amerson v. Doctor Bradford, (11th Cir. 2025).

Christopher Lee Amerson v. Doctor Bradford (Christopher Lee Amerson v. Doctor Bradford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Supreme Fuels Trading FZE v. Sargeant
689 F.3d 1244 (Eleventh Circuit, 2012)