Christopher Lee Amerson v. Doctor Bradford

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
• Decided: June 26, 2025
• Docket: 25-11489
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

USCA11 Case: 25-11489 Document: 8-1 Date Filed: 06/26/2025 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 25-11489 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________

CHRISTOPHER LEE AMERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus DOCTOR BRADFORD, MACON SP WARDEN, DEPUTY WARDEN OF MACON STATE PRISON, JOHN DOE, Medical Director, WILLIAMS, et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

____________________ USCA11 Case: 25-11489 Document: 8-1 Date Filed: 06/26/2025 Page: 2 of 2

2 Opinion of the Court 25-11489

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia D.C. Docket No. 5:23-cv-00268-MTT-CHW ____________________

Before JILL PRYOR, GRANT, and BRASHER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdic- tion. Christopher Amerson appeals from the district court’s April 8, 2025, order denying his construed motion for reconsideration of the court’s order dismissing his claims brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against several defendants. Neither order is final and appeal- able, however, because the district court did not dismiss Amerson’s deliberate indifference claim against defendant Bradford, which re- mains pending, or include a Rule 54(b) certification that would per- mit us to consider its order of dismissal as a final and appealable judgment. See 28 U.S.C. § 1291; Supreme Fuels Trading FZE v. Sargeant, 689 F.3d 1244, 1246 (11th Cir. 2012) (noting that an order that disposes of fewer than all claims against all parties to an action is not immediately appealable absent certification pursuant to Rule 54(b)). No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all other applicable rules.