Christopher Laney v. State
Opinion
The State of TexasAppellee
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas November 21, 2013
No. 04-13-00783-CR, and 04-13-00784-CR
Christopher LANEY, Appellant v.
The STATE of Texas, Appellee
From the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2007CR6078W, and 2010CR12838 Honorable Philip A. Kazen, Jr., Judge Presiding
ORDER In the interest of the efficient administration of the court’s docket, we order Appeal Nos. 04-13-00783-CR and 04-13-00784-CR consolidated. The parties must file motions, briefs, and other pleadings as if the appeals were one but put both appeal numbers in the style of the case. The cases must be argued together in one brief, as in a single appeal, and if oral argument is requested and granted, the entire case must be argued as a single appeal, with the total time limit for each party equal to the ordinary time limit for a party in a single appeal.
However, a record must be filed in each appeal, the record in each case will remain separate and, if supplementation of the record becomes necessary, the supplemental material must be filed in the appeal to which it applies. The court will dispose of both appeals in the same judgment, opinion, and mandate.
_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 21st day of November, 2013.
___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Christopher Laney v. State (Christopher Laney v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.