Christopher Lamont Jones v. the State of Texas

CourtTexas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)
DecidedJune 11, 2026
Docket07-26-00291-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Christopher Lamont Jones v. the State of Texas (Christopher Lamont Jones v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Christopher Lamont Jones v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2026).

Opinion

In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07-26-00291-CR

CHRISTOPHER LAMONT JONES, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

On Appeal from the 100th District Court Childress County, Texas Trial Court No. 8313, Honorable Dale A. Rabe, Jr., Presiding

June 11, 2026 ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND Before PARKER, C.J., and DOSS and PRATT, JJ.

Appellant, Christopher Lamont Jones, appeals from the trial court’s judgment

adjudicating him guilty of burglary of a habitation 1 and sentencing him to thirty-five years

of confinement. The reporter’s record is due June 8, 2026. However, the court reporter

has advised this Court that, due to a malfunction of the stenographic recording equipment,

1 See TEX. PENAL CODE § 30.02. no stenographic notes were made of the proceedings. Thus, the reporter is unable to

prepare and file the reporter’s record.

Accordingly, we abate this appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for

findings pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 34.6(f), which governs an

appellant’s entitlement to a new trial when a reporter’s record has been lost or destroyed.

See Mendoza v. State, No. 07-14-00034-CR, 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 6485, at *2–3 (Tex.

App.—Amarillo June 16, 2014, no pet.) (per curiam) (abating and remanding appeal for

findings under Rule 34.6(f)).

Upon remand, the trial court shall conduct a hearing and determine:

(1) whether, through no fault of Appellant, a significant portion of the court reporter’s notes and records has been lost or destroyed, or, if the proceedings were electronically recorded, whether a significant portion of the recording is inaudible;

(2) if so, whether the lost, destroyed, or inaudible portion of the reporter’s record is necessary to the resolution of the appeal; and

(3) whether the lost, destroyed, or inaudible portion of the reporter’s record can be replaced by agreement of the parties. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.6(f).

The trial court is directed to enter written findings of fact on these matters. A

supplemental clerk’s record containing the trial court’s findings, together with a reporter’s

record of any hearing conducted pursuant to this order, shall be filed with this Court on or

before July 13, 2026.

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Christopher Lamont Jones v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christopher-lamont-jones-v-the-state-of-texas-txctapp7-2026.