Home/Court of Appeals of Texas/Christopher Lamont Aldridge v. State

Christopher Lamont Aldridge v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 12, 2011
Docket07-11-00276-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Christopher Lamont Aldridge v. State (Christopher Lamont Aldridge v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Christopher Lamont Aldridge v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

NO. 07-11-0276-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL C

AUGUST 12, 2011

______________________________

CHRISTOPHER ALDRIDGE, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE 21ST DISTRICT COURT OF BASTROP COUNTY;

NO. 10,874; HONORABLE CHRISTOPHER D. DUGGAN, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

ABATEMENT AND REMAND

            Following a plea of true to the State's Motion to Revoke Community Supervision which had been granted to Appellant, Christopher Aldridge, upon his conviction for aggravated assault causing serious bodily injury,[1] the trial court revoked community supervision and sentenced him to five years confinement and a fine of $1,824.25.  When the clerk's record was filed on August 9, 2011, it came to this Court's attention that the Trial Court's Certification of Defendant's Right of Appeal contained in the clerk's record is not signed by Appellant as required by Rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Consequently, we abate this appeal and remand this cause to the trial court for further proceedings.  Upon remand, the trial court shall utilize whatever means necessary to secure a proper Trial Court's Certification of Defendant's Right of Appeal in compliance with Rule 25.2(d).  Once properly completed and executed, the certification shall be included in a supplemental clerk's record.  See Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(a)(12).  The trial court shall cause the supplemental clerk's record to be filed with the Clerk of this Court by September 26, 2011.  This order constitutes notice to all parties, pursuant to Rule 37.1 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, of the defective certification.  If a supplemental clerk's record containing a proper certification is not filed in accordance with this order, this cause will be referred to the Court for dismissal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d).

It is so ordered.

                                                                        Per Curiam

Do not publish.


[1]Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 22.02(a)(1) (West 2011).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Haley v. State
173 S.W.3d 510 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2005)
Ngo v. State
175 S.W.3d 738 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2005)
Malpica v. State
108 S.W.3d 374 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2003)
Sierra v. State
157 S.W.3d 52 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2005)
Nanez v. State
179 S.W.3d 149 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2005)
Hanson v. State
269 S.W.3d 130 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2008)
Mitchell v. State
931 S.W.2d 950 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1996)
Cate v. State
124 S.W.3d 922 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2004)
Fields v. State
1 S.W.3d 687 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1999)
Klock v. State
177 S.W.3d 53 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2005)
Haley v. State
113 S.W.3d 801 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2003)
Sierra v. State
218 S.W.3d 85 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2007)
Almanza v. State
686 S.W.2d 157 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Christopher Lamont Aldridge v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christopher-lamont-aldridge-v-state-texapp-2011.