Christopher Kluwe v. Huntington Beach Union High School District, et al.

CourtDistrict Court, C.D. California
DecidedDecember 19, 2025
Docket8:25-cv-01648
StatusUnknown

This text of Christopher Kluwe v. Huntington Beach Union High School District, et al. (Christopher Kluwe v. Huntington Beach Union High School District, et al.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, C.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Christopher Kluwe v. Huntington Beach Union High School District, et al., (C.D. Cal. 2025).

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 CHRISTOPHER KLUWE, Case No. 8:25-cv-1648-FWS-JDEx 12 Plaintiff, STIPULATED PROTECTIVE 13 v. ORDER HUNTINGTON BEACH UNION 14 HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., [Note Changes by the Court] 15 Defendants. 16

17 Based on the Parties’ Stipulation (Dkt. 74) and for good cause shown, the 18 Court finds and orders as follows. 19 As Parties and Non-Parties in the above-captioned case (the “Action” or this 20 “Litigation”) may be subject to discovery requests and/or proceedings that seek the 21 disclosure of information that is confidential, proprietary, and/or private for which 22 special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than pursuing this litigation may be warranted, pursuant Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 26(c), the Court enters the following Protective Order. The parties have 24 acknowledged that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures 25 or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and 26 use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential 27 treatment under the applicable legal principles. 28 1 Good cause exists for this Protective Order because Defendant Epting wishes 2 to preserve the confidentiality of his personal identifying information and financial 3 any relevant information. Defendant Huntington Beach Union High School District 4 wishes to preserve the confidentiality of its personnel files and employee records and 5 the third-party privacy rights of its employees and students. 6 Accordingly, to expedite the flow of information, to facilitate the prompt 7 resolution of disputes over confidentiality of discovery materials, to adequately 8 protect information the parties are entitled to keep confidential, to ensure that the 9 Parties are permitted reasonable necessary uses of such material in preparation for 10 and in the conduct of trial, to address their handling at the end of the litigation, and 11 serve the ends of justice, a protective order for such information is justified in this 12 matter. It is the intent of the Parties that information will not be designated as 13 confidential for tactical reasons and that nothing be so designated without a good 14 faith belief that it has been maintained in a confidential, non-public manner, and there 15 is good cause why it should not be part of the public record of this case. 16 I. DEFINITIONS. 17 A. Action or Litigation: The above-captioned action pending in the United 18 States District Court for the Central District of California, Christopher Kluwe v. 19 Huntington Beach Union High School District, et al., No. 8:25-cv-01648 (C.D. Cal.). 20 B. Challenging Party: A party that challenges the designation of material, 21 information, or items under this Order. 22 C. Confidential Material: Non-public material, information, or items 23 containing information the Designating Party has maintained in confidence and in 24 good faith believes contain genuinely private, financial, medical, or other 25 confidential information entitled to protection under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 26(c) or other applicable law. 27 D. Counsel: Outside Counsel of Record and In-House Counsel (as well as 28 their support staff). 1 E. Designating Party: A Party or Non-Party that designates material, 2 information, or items that it produces in disclosures or in response to discovery as 3 Confidential Material or Highly Confidential Material. 4 F. Disclosure or Discovery Material: All material, items, or information, 5 regardless of the medium or manner in which they are generated, stored, or 6 maintained (including, among other things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible 7 things), that are produced or generated in disclosures or responses to discovery in the 8 Litigation. 9 G. Expert: A person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter 10 pertinent to the Litigation who has been retained by a Party or its Counsel to serve as 11 an expert witness or consultant in the Litigation. 12 H. Highly Confidential: Non-public material, information, or items 13 containing information the Designating Party has maintained in confidence and in 14 good faith believes contain genuinely and extremely sensitive private, financial, 15 medical, or other confidential information entitled to protection under Federal Rule 16 of Civil Procedure 26(c) or other applicable law, particularly private and personal 17 financial information, which warrants heightened protection and that disclosure of 18 which would risk serious injury. 19 I. In-House Counsel: Attorneys who are employees of a Party in this 20 Litigation. In-House Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any 21 other outside counsel. 22 J. Non-Party: Any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or 23 other legal entity not named as a Party in this Action. 24 K. Outside Counsel of Record: Attorneys who are not employees of a Party 25 in this Litigation but are retained to represent or advise a Party to the Action and have 26 appeared in the Litigation on behalf of that Party or are affiliated with or contracted 27 by a law firm which has appeared on behalf of that Party. 28 / / / 1 L. Party: Any party to this Action—including Plaintiff Christopher Kluwe, 2 Defendant Huntington Beach Union High School District, Defendants Carolee 3 Ogata, Susan Henry, Daniel Bryan, Daniel Morris, and Edward Begany (in their 4 individual and official capacities), and Defendant Christian Epting—including all of 5 their respective officers, directors, and employees. 6 M. Producing Non-Party: A Non-Party that produces Disclosure or 7 Discovery Material in this Litigation. 8 N. Producing Party: A Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery 9 Material in this Litigation. 10 O. Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support 11 services (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or 12 demonstrations, and organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) 13 and their employees and subcontractors. 14 P. Protected Material: Any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is 15 designated as Confidential Material or Highly Confidential Material. 16 Q. Receiving Party: A Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material 17 from a Producing Party. 18 II. MATERIALS COVERED. 19 A. Scope: This Protective Order governs the handling of Disclosure or 20 Discovery Material designated as “Confidential Material” or “Highly Confidential” 21 (as these terms are defined above) regardless of the medium or manner in which the 22 materials are generated, stored, or maintained. Any Producing Party or Producing 23 Non-Party may, based on a good-faith belief that such materials are entitled to 24 protection under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c) or other applicable law, 25 designate all or any part of a document, discovery response, deposition, or other 26 material that they produce, serve, or provide in connection with the Actions as 27 “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” as described below. The 28 designation of any material as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” 1 will constitute a representation by a Producing Party or Producing Non-Party that it 2 has made a good-faith determination that any material so designated is confidential 3 or protected under Federal Rule 26 and this Protective Order. In no event shall a 4 Producing Party or Producing Non-Party automatically designate every document 5 produced as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL”.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pintos v. PACIFIC CREDITORS ASS'N
605 F.3d 665 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)
Makar-Wellbon v. Sony Electronics, Inc.
187 F.R.D. 576 (E.D. Wisconsin, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Christopher Kluwe v. Huntington Beach Union High School District, et al., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christopher-kluwe-v-huntington-beach-union-high-school-district-et-al-cacd-2025.