Christopher Keith Schmotzer v. Robyn Michelle Schmotzer

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided March 8, 2012·No. 13-11-00456-CV·Published

Opinion

NUMBER 13-11-00456-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________

CHRISTOPHER KEITH SCHMOTZER, Appellant,

v.

ROBYN MICHELLE SCHMOTZER, Appellee. ____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 85th District Court of Brazos County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides, and Perkes Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam The appellant's brief in the above cause was due on December 13, 2011. On

January 11, 2012, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that the brief had not been

timely filed and that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution under

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1), unless within ten days from the date of

receipt of this letter, appellant reasonably explained the failure and the appellee was not significantly injured by the appellant's failure to timely file a brief. To date, no response

has been received from appellant.

Appellant has failed to either reasonably explain his failure to file a brief, file a

motion for extension of time to file his brief, or file his brief. Accordingly, the appeal is

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b).

Any pending motions are dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 8th day of March, 2012.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Christopher Keith Schmotzer v. Robyn Michelle Schmotzer, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Christopher Keith Schmotzer v. Robyn Michelle Schmotzer (Christopher Keith Schmotzer v. Robyn Michelle Schmotzer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.