CHRISTOPHER JUNIOR PIERRE vs STATE OF FLORIDA
This text of CHRISTOPHER JUNIOR PIERRE vs STATE OF FLORIDA (CHRISTOPHER JUNIOR PIERRE vs STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
CHRISTOPHER JUNIOR PIERRE,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D21-2582 LT Case No. 2019-CF-16226-A-O
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee. ________________________________/
Opinion filed April 8, 2022
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Luis Fernando Calderon, Judge.
Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Ryan M. Belanger, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Christopher J. Pierre, Lake Butler, pro se.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Deborah A. Chance, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee. PER CURIAM.
In this Anders1 appeal, we affirm the judgment and sentences imposed
by the trial court after trial but find it necessary to remand to correct a
scrivener’s error in the judgment.
Pierre was convicted of, among other things, discharging a firearm in
public (count three). The trial court orally pronounced Pierre’s sentence on
this count to be “one year in the Orange County Jail with credit for 30 days
time served.” The court also ordered that this sentence be served
concurrently with the lengthier prison sentences that it had just imposed on
Pierre on counts one and two.
However, the written judgment, while accurately reflecting Pierre’s
adjudication of guilt on count three, inadvertently failed to include the actual
sentence imposed. Accordingly, we remand for the trial court to enter an
amended judgment that includes the sentence that it imposed on Pierre for
count three. Pierre’s presence is not required for this ministerial correction.
See Walker v. State, 288 So. 3d 694, 696 (Fla. 4th DCA 2019).
AFFIRMED; REMANDED for entry of amended judgment to correct
scrivener’s error.
LAMBERT, C.J., HARRIS and TRAVER, JJ., concur.
1 Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
CHRISTOPHER JUNIOR PIERRE vs STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christopher-junior-pierre-vs-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2022.