Christopher John Longazel v. the State of Texas
This text of Christopher John Longazel v. the State of Texas (Christopher John Longazel v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-22-00244-CR No. 10-22-00245-CR
CHRISTOPHER JOHN LONGAZEL, Appellant v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
From the 66th District Court Hill County, Texas Trial Court Nos. F168-22 & F169-22
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Christopher Longazel attempts to appeal his convictions for possession of a
controlled substance. The certificate of right to appeal in each cause number indicates
that this is a plea bargain case and that Longazel waived his right to appeal. Because the
trial court’s certificate of right of appeal that Longazel signed indicates that Longazel has
no right to appeal and has waived his right to appeal, this appeal must be dismissed. See
TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); (“The appeal must be dismissed if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made a part of the record under these
rules.”); Chavez v. State, 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) (plea bargain); Monreal
v. State, 99 S.W.3d 615, 622 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003 (waiver of appeal).
Accordingly, the appeals are dismissed.
STEVE SMITH Justice
Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Johnson, and Justice Smith Appeals dismissed Opinion delivered and filed August 3, 2022 Do not publish [CR25]
Longazel v. State Page 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Christopher John Longazel v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christopher-john-longazel-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2022.