Christopher Jason Gray v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedOctober 29, 2014
DocketA15A0274
StatusPublished

This text of Christopher Jason Gray v. State (Christopher Jason Gray v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Christopher Jason Gray v. State, (Ga. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ October 24, 2014

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15A0274. CHRISTOPHER JASON GRAY v. THE STATE.

In 1995, Christopher Gray pled guilty to kidnapping, rape, aggravated assault, aggravated sodomy, and armed robbery and was sentenced to life in prison followed by 20 years. In August of 2014, Gray filed a motion to correct void sentence, arguing that the trial court lacked jurisdiction over him. We lack jurisdiction. The Supreme Court has made clear that a post-conviction motion seeking to vacate an allegedly void criminal conviction is not one of the established procedures for challenging the validity of a judgment in a criminal case, and an appeal from the trial court’s ruling on such a petition should be dismissed. See Roberts v. State, 286 Ga. 532 (690 SE2d 150) (2010); Harper v. State, 286 Ga. 216, 218 (1) (686 SE2d 786) (2009). A direct appeal may lie from the denial of a motion to correct a void sentence if the defendant raises a colorable claim that the sentence is void. See Burg v. State, 297 Ga. App. 118, 119 (676 SE2d 465) (2009). A sentence is void only when the trial court imposes a punishment that the law does not allow; assertions taking issue with the procedure employed in imposing the sentence do not constitute colorable void sentence claims. See Coleman v. State, 305 Ga. App. 680 (700 SE2d 668) (2010). Here, Gray does not allege any colorable void sentence claim. Rather, he argues that the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction. Because Gray is not authorized to collaterally attack his conviction in this manner, we lack jurisdiction to consider his appeal. Accordingly, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED. Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 10/24/2014 Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harper v. State
686 S.E.2d 786 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2009)
Burg v. State
676 S.E.2d 465 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2009)
Roberts v. State
690 S.E.2d 150 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2010)
Coleman v. State
700 S.E.2d 668 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Christopher Jason Gray v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christopher-jason-gray-v-state-gactapp-2014.