Christopher J. McCloskey v. Anne Miriam McCloskey, Michael A. Craig, and Fidelity Investments D/B/A National Financial Services, L.L.C.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 24, 2008
Docket14-08-00365-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Christopher J. McCloskey v. Anne Miriam McCloskey, Michael A. Craig, and Fidelity Investments D/B/A National Financial Services, L.L.C. (Christopher J. McCloskey v. Anne Miriam McCloskey, Michael A. Craig, and Fidelity Investments D/B/A National Financial Services, L.L.C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Christopher J. McCloskey v. Anne Miriam McCloskey, Michael A. Craig, and Fidelity Investments D/B/A National Financial Services, L.L.C., (Tex. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 24, 2008

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 24, 2008.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-08-00365-CV

CHRISTOPHER JOSEPH MCCLOSKEY, Appellant

V.

ANNE MIRIAM MCCLOSKEY, Appellee

On Appeal from the 387th District Court

Fort Bend County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 07-CV-160708

M E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N


This is an appeal from a judgment signed January 18, 2008.  Appellant  filed a timely motion for new trial and motion for reconsideration.  The notice of appeal was due April 17, 2008.  See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1.  Appellant, however, filed his notice of appeal[1] on April 21, 2008, a date within 15 days of the due date for the notice of appeal.  See Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997).  Appellant did not file a motion to extend time to file the notice of appeal.  On June 12, 2008, we ordered appellant to file a proper motion to extend time to file the notice of appeal on or before June 23, 2008.  See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3;10.5(b).

On June 23, 2008, appellant filed a motion to extend time to file the notice of appeal; however, this motion contains no reasonable explanation[2] to support the late filing.  Because appellant has not presented a reasonable explanation for his untimely filing of the notice of appeal, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion filed July 24, 2008.

Panel consists of Justices Yates, Anderson, and Brown.



[1]  Appellant=s notice of appeal is entitled ANOTICE OF APPEAL/RESTRICTED APPEAL.@  Although the title includes the term, Arestricted appeal,@ appellant is not entitled to bring a restricted appeal.  A restricted appeal is available only under the following circumstances, which must be stated and verified in the notice of appeal: (1) the party was affected by the trial court=s judgment but did not participate, either in person or through counsel in the hearing that resulted in the judgment; and (2) the party did not timely file either a postjudgment motion or notice of appeal.  Tex. R. App. P. 25.1(d)(7).  Appellant timely filed a postjudgment motion and thus, is not entitled to file a restricted appeal. 

[2]  A reasonable explanation is Aany plausible statement of circumstances indicating that failure to file within the [required] period was not deliberate or intentional, but was the result of inadvertence, mistake or mischance.@  Weik v. Second Baptist Church of Houston, 988 S.W.2d 437, 439 (Tex. App.BHouston [1st Dist.] 1999, pet. denied).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Verburgt v. Dorner
959 S.W.2d 615 (Texas Supreme Court, 1998)
Weik v. Second Baptist Church of Houston
988 S.W.2d 437 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Christopher J. McCloskey v. Anne Miriam McCloskey, Michael A. Craig, and Fidelity Investments D/B/A National Financial Services, L.L.C., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christopher-j-mccloskey-v-anne-miriam-mccloskey-mi-texapp-2008.