Christopher Hunter v. State
187 So. 3d 1265, 2016 WL 1260907, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 5037
Opinion
As the State properly concedes, the order summarily denying Appellant’s-Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion does not include record attachments conclusively refuting Appellant’s claim that wiretap orders were never signed. Upon remand, the trial court shall attach the correct records or address the claim on the merits. Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850(f)(4). In all other respects, the order on appeal is affirmed.
AFFIRMED IN PART;' REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Christopher Hunter v. State, 187 So. 3d 1265, 2016 WL 1260907, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 5037 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).
187 So. 3d 1265 (Christopher Hunter v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jones v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Putnam County)
M.D. Florida, 2022
Johnny L. Jones v. State
226 So. 3d 1012 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)