Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Christopher Hunter v. State

Christopher Hunter v. State

187 So. 3d 1265, 2016 WL 1260907, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 5037
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 1, 2016
Docket5D15-773
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 187 So. 3d 1265 (Christopher Hunter v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Christopher Hunter v. State, 187 So. 3d 1265, 2016 WL 1260907, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 5037 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

As the State properly concedes, the order summarily denying Appellant’s-Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion does not include record attachments conclusively refuting Appellant’s claim that wiretap orders were never signed. Upon remand, the trial court shall attach the correct records or address the claim on the merits. Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850(f)(4). In all other respects, the order on appeal is affirmed.

AFFIRMED IN PART;' REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.

ORFINGER, TORPY and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jones v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Putnam County)
M.D. Florida, 2022
Johnny L. Jones v. State
226 So. 3d 1012 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
187 So. 3d 1265, 2016 WL 1260907, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 5037, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christopher-hunter-v-state-fladistctapp-2016.