Christopher Hedlund v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided June 7, 2013·No. 01-12-00378-CR·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Christopher Hedlund v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-12-00378-CR

Trial court case number: 1749885

Trial court: County Criminal Court at Law No. 8 of Harris County

Appellant, Christopher Hedlund, has filed a motion to abate the appeal and to remand the case to the trial court for an out-of-time motion for new trial. The motion is denied. Moreover, the Court of Criminal Appeals has indicated that when the record on direct appeal concerning the representation is undeveloped and does not reflect counsel’s motives, “an application for a writ of habeas corpus is [a] more appropriate vehicle [than by direct appeal] to raise ineffective assistance of counsel claims.” Rylander v. State, 101 S.W.3d 107, 110 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003); see Oldham v. State, 977 S.W.2d 354, 363 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998) (stating that such claims may be raised on habeas corpus even after rejection on appeal). It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Sherry Radack  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: June 7, 2013

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Christopher Hedlund v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Christopher Hedlund v. State (Christopher Hedlund v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rylander v. State
101 S.W.3d 107 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2003)
Oldham v. State
977 S.W.2d 354 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1998)