Christopher Hamilton v. State
This text of Christopher Hamilton v. State (Christopher Hamilton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
JUDGMENT RENDERED APRIL 14, 2021
NO. 03-19-00244-CR
Christopher Hamilton, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
APPEAL FROM THE 390TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, KELLY, AND SMITH MODIFIED AND, AS MODIFIED, AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN
This is an appeal from the judgments of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed
the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no error in the court’s
judgments requiring reversal. However, there was error in the judgments that require correction.
Therefore, the Court modifies the trial court’s judgments as follows: We modify the judgment
for murder to state that the “Statute for Offense” is section 19.02(b) of the Penal Code and
modify the judgments for the two counts of aggravated robbery to state that the “Statute for
Offense” is section 29.03(a) of the Penal Code. The judgments, as modified, are affirmed.
Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Christopher Hamilton v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christopher-hamilton-v-state-texapp-2021.