Christopher Hall v. Shawn Nisbit
Opinion
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ___________
No. 21-2139 __________
CHRISTOPHER R. HALL, Appellant
v.
DETECTIVE SHAWN NISBIT; DETECTIVE RICHARD BEAGHLEY; OFFICER RYAN HASARA; SERGEANT OSWALDO TOLEDO; OFFICER JOHN LANDES; OFFICER RAYMOND TOWNSEND; OFFICER WILLIAM PLYMOUTH; SERGEANT SHAWN WILLIAMS; OFFICER JEFFREY ANDERSON; SERGEANT RICHARD KONDAN; SERGEANT SHANE LAROSA; OFFICER ROBERT HILL, JR.; OFFICER RYAN BROWN; OFFICER OFC. AMMATURO; OFFICER OFC. FARLEY; OFFICER OFC. NYMAN; ABINGTON TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT; MUNICIPAL TOWNSHIP BUILDING ____________________________________
On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (D.C. Civil Action No. 2:19-cv-04382) District Judge: Honorable Eduardo C. Robreno ______________ SUR PETITION FOR REHEARING ______________
Present: GREENAWAY, JR., PORTER, and NYGAARD, Circuit Judges
The petition for rehearing filed by Appellees in the above-entitled case having
been submitted to the judges who participated in the decision of this Court, is hereby
ORDERED that the petition for rehearing by the panel is GRANTED IN PART. The
Clerk is directed to file the amended opinion and judgment contemporaneously with this
order. The petition is DENIED as to rehearing en banc, as a majority of the judges in
regular service have not voted for rehearing.
BY THE COURT,
s/Joseph A. Greenaway, Jr. Circuit Judge
Date: March 29, 2022 cc: All Counsel of Record
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Christopher Hall v. Shawn Nisbit (Christopher Hall v. Shawn Nisbit) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.