Christopher GG. v. Missy HH.
This text of 14 A.D.3d 959 (Christopher GG. v. Missy HH.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[960]*960Crew III, J. Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Fulton County (Jung, J.), entered November 5, 2003, which, inter alia, dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Ct Act article 5, to vacate a prior order of filiation.
The parties ended their brief sexual relationship in December 1998 and, in July 1999, respondent gave birth to a daughter. Thereafter, in October 1999, upon petitioner’s admission of paternity, an order of filiation was entered declaring petitioner to be the father of the subject child.
While this appeal was pending, a Herkimer County Support Magistrate ordered that the parties and the child submit to genetic marker testing. Inasmuch as petitioner has now obtained the primary relief sought in this proceeding, the instant appeal is moot. As we are unable to discern any exception to the mootness doctrine (see Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707, 714-715 [1980]), petitioner’s appeal is dismissed.
Cardona, P.J., Peters, Carpinello and Rose, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.
As a transcript of the filiation proceeding is not contained in the record on appeal, it is unclear whether, prior to admitting paternity, petitioner was advised of his right to DNA testing pursuant to Family Ct Act § 532.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
14 A.D.3d 959, 788 N.Y.S.2d 624, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 621, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christopher-gg-v-missy-hh-nyappdiv-2005.