Christopher Garner v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided February 15, 2006·No. 10-05-00218-CR·Published

Opinion

IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

 

No. 10-05-00218-CR

Christopher Garner,

                                                                      Appellant

 v.

The State of Texas,

                                                                      Appellee


From the 361st District Court

Brazos County, Texas

Trial Court No. 04-03224-CRF-361

ABATEMENT ORDER


          Appellant’s brief is overdue, and after notice to appellant’s counsel to file a brief or extension request, none has been filed. Therefore, we abate this cause to the trial court for a hearing to determine: (1) why a brief has not been filed on appellant’s behalf; (2) whether counsel has abandoned the appeal; (3) whether appellant still desires to proceed with the appeal; and (4) whether appellant desires self-representation.  See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(3); Fewins v. State, 170 S.W.3d 293 (Tex. App.—Waco 2005, order). 

The trial court shall conduct the hearing within 30 days after the date of this order.  The trial court clerk and the court reporter shall file supplemental records within 45 days after the date of this order.  See Fewins, 170 S.W.3d at 296-97.

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Vance, and

Justice Reyna

Order issued and filed February 15, 2006

Do not publish

[CR25]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Christopher Garner v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2006).

Christopher Garner v. State (Christopher Garner v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fewins v. State
170 S.W.3d 293 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2005)