Christopher Gabriel Valencia v. Medina

• Court: District Court, E.D. California
• Decided: June 5, 2026
• Docket: 1:22-cv-00569
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHRISTOPHER GABRIEL VALENCIA, No. 1:22-cv-00569-JLT-SAB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER TERMINATING ACTION PURSUANT TO THE PARTIES’ 13 v. STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL 14 MEDINA, (ECF No. 55) 15 Defendant. 16 17

18 On June 4, 2026, the parties filed a stipulation to dismiss this action with prejudice pursuant 19 to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, as the case has been resolved in its 20 entirety. (ECF No. 55.) 21 Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) provides in pertinent part that, “the plaintiff may dismiss an action 22 without a court order by filing . . . a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared. 23 A voluntary stipulation to dismiss an action pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) automatically 24 terminates the action without operation of a court order.” Black Rock City, LLC v. Pershing Cty. 25 Bd. of Comm’rs, 637 F. App’x 488 (9th Cir. 2016) (citing Commercial Space Mgmt. Co. v. Boeing 26 Co., 193 F.3d 1074, 1077 (9th Cir. 1999)). Here, Plaintiff and counsel for Defendant have signed 27 and dated a stipulation to dismiss this action, and filed it with the Court. 28 1 In light of parties’ stipulation for voluntary dismissal, this action is terminated by operation 2 | of law without further order from the Court. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Each party is to bear 3 | its own litigation costs and attorney’s fees. The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate all 4 | pending motions and deadlines and close this action. 5 6 7 | ITIS SO ORDERED. (Se _ 8 | Dated: _ June 5, 2026 OF 9 STANLEY A. BOONE United States Magistrate Judge 10 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28