Christopher Fountain v. A-Okay Enterprises, LLC, et al.

• Court: District Court, D. Kansas
• Decided: February 24, 2026
• Docket: 6:26-cv-01037
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

CHRISTOPHER FOUNTAIN,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 26-1037-JWB-BGS

A-OKAY ENTERPRISES, LLC, et al.,

Defendants.

MEMORANDUM & ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FEES

This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff Christopher Fountain’s Motion to Proceed without Prepayment of Fees, which requests leave for Plaintiff to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (Doc. 3, sealed.) For the reasons set forth herein, Plaintiff’s IFP application (Doc. 3) is GRANTED. That stated, because of the Court’s contemporaneously filed Report & Recommendation of Dismissal to the District Court, the undersigned Magistrate Judge directs that the Clerk shall not issue summons for service upon the Defendants at this time. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), a federal court may authorize commencement of a civil action “without prepayment of fees or security therefor, by a person who submits an affidavit that . . . the person is unable to pay such fees or give security therefor.” To succeed on an IFP motion, “the movant must show a financial inability to pay the required filing fees.” Lister v. Dep’t of Treasury, 408 F.3d 1309, 1312 (10th Cir. 2005). Proceeding IFP “in a civil case is a privilege, not a right – fundamental or otherwise.” White v. Colorado, 157 F.3d 1226, 1233 (10th Cir. 1998). The decision to grant or deny IFP status under § 1915 lies within the district court’s sound discretion. Engberg v. Wyoming, 265 F.3d 1109, 1122 (10th Cir. 2001). Based on the financial information provided by Plaintiff in his motion (Doc. 3, sealed) and affidavit of financial status (Doc. 3-1, sealed), the Court finds that his financial situation, when taking into account any income as well as debts and financial obligations, establishes his inability to pay the required filing fee and his access to the Court would be significantly inhibited if this motion was not granted. Thus, the Court GRANTS his motion to proceed without prepayment of fees (Doc. 3, sealed.)

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff’s IFP motion (Doc. 3) is GRANTED. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1), Plaintiff may commence this action without prepayment of fees. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, because of the Court’s contemporaneously filed Report & Recommendation of Dismissal, the Clerk shall not issue summons for service upon the Defendants at this time. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this 24th day of February, 2026, at Wichita, Kansas. /S/ BROOKS G. SEVERSON Brooks G. Severson United States Magistrate Judge