Christopher Fine v. Steven Ward and Levi Mendyk, In the Matter of the Titles, Ballot Titles, and Submission Clauses for Proposed Initiatives 2021-2022 67, 115, and 128 and Teresa Conley, David Powell, and Jeremiah Barry Title Board:

2022 CO 37
CourtSupreme Court of Colorado
DecidedJune 27, 2022
Docket22SA142
StatusPublished

This text of 2022 CO 37 (Christopher Fine v. Steven Ward and Levi Mendyk, In the Matter of the Titles, Ballot Titles, and Submission Clauses for Proposed Initiatives 2021-2022 67, 115, and 128 and Teresa Conley, David Powell, and Jeremiah Barry Title Board:) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Christopher Fine v. Steven Ward and Levi Mendyk, In the Matter of the Titles, Ballot Titles, and Submission Clauses for Proposed Initiatives 2021-2022 67, 115, and 128 and Teresa Conley, David Powell, and Jeremiah Barry Title Board:, 2022 CO 37 (Colo. 2022).

Opinion

Original Proceedings Pursuant to § 1-40-107(2), C.R.S. (2021) Appeals from the Ballot Title Setting Board

Attorneys for Petitioner:

Recht Kornfeld, P.C.

Mark G. Grueskin

Denver, Colorado

Attorneys for Respondent:

Maven Law Group

Suzanne Taheri

Englewood, Colorado

Attorneys for Title Board in Cases 22SA101 and 22SA155:

Philip J. Weiser, Attorney General

Emily B. Buckley, Assistant Attorney General

Attorneys for Title Board in Case 22SA142:

Peter G. Baumann, Assistant Attorney General

Denver, Colorado

JUSTICE HART delivered the Opinion of the Court, in which CHIEF JUSTICE BOATRIGHT, JUSTICE MÁRQUEZ, JUSTICE HOOD, JUSTICE GABRIEL, JUSTICE SAMOUR, and JUSTICE BERKENKOTTER joined.

OPINION

HART JUSTICE

¶1 In this opinion, we consider whether three proposed initiatives-Initiative 2021-2022 #67, Initiative 2021-2022 #115, and Initiative 2021-2022 #128 (collectively, "Initiatives")-violate the single-subject requirement of the Colorado Constitution. Each of the Initiatives includes provisions that would allow food retailers already licensed to sell beer to also sell wine and provisions that would authorize third-party delivery services to deliver all alcohol beverages sold from licensed retailers to consumers at their homes.

¶2 We hold that these provisions combine two subjects that are not necessarily or properly connected: (1) the sale of wine at grocery stores and (2) the home delivery of alcohol by third parties. The Initiatives therefore violate the single-subject requirement, and the Title Board lacked jurisdiction to set titles for them. Accordingly, we reverse the Board's actions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2022 CO 37, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christopher-fine-v-steven-ward-and-levi-mendyk-in-the-matter-of-the-colo-2022.