Christopher Falzone v. State of Florida

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

CHRISTOPHER FALZONE,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D2024-0662

[February 26, 2025]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Andrew L. Siegel, Judge; L.T. Case No. 18-009848CF10A.

Melanie Anitra Malavé, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Paul Patti, III, Senior Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Franqui v. State, 59 So. 3d 82, 96 (Fla. 2011) (recognizing that “mere conclusory allegations” are insufficient to state a claim under rule 3.850); Hammond v. State, 34 So. 3d 58, 60-61 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (holding that claims lacking specific facts establishing a reasonable probability of prejudice should be summarily denied).

MAY, GERBER and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.