Christopher Estrada v. State
This text of Christopher Estrada v. State (Christopher Estrada v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
|
|
NUMBER 13-02-537-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI
___________________________________________________________________
CHRISTOPHER ESTRADA, Appellant,
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.
__________________________________________________________________
On appeal from the 105th District Court
of Nueces County, Texas
__________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Rodriguez, Castillo, and Kennedy[1]
Opinion Per Curiam
Appellant, CHRISTOPHER ESTRADA, attempted to perfect an appeal from a judgment entered by the 105th District Court of Nueces County, Texas. On November 26, 2002, the trial court granted appellant=s motion for new trial.
The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file and the trial court=s order granting a new trial, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.
PER CURIAM
Do not publish.
Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Opinion delivered and filed this
the 9th day of January, 2003.
[1]Retired Justice Noah Kennedy assigned to this Court by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Texas pursuant to Tex. Gov=t Code Ann. ' 74.003 (Vernon 1998).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Christopher Estrada v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christopher-estrada-v-state-texapp-2003.