Christopher Deaton v. Arkansas Dept. of Correction

587 F. App'x 992
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedDecember 17, 2014
Docket14-1916
StatusUnpublished

This text of 587 F. App'x 992 (Christopher Deaton v. Arkansas Dept. of Correction) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Christopher Deaton v. Arkansas Dept. of Correction, 587 F. App'x 992 (8th Cir. 2014).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Arkansas prisoner Christopher Deaton appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of his pro se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint asserting violations of his constitutional rights and rights under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Person Act of 2000, 42 U.S.C. § 2000cc et seq. The district court dismissed the complaint partially under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and partially on summary judgment. Upon careful de novo review, we find no basis for reversal. See Cooper v. Schriro, 189 F.3d 781, 783 (8th Cir.1999) (per curiam) (standard of review for § 1915A dismissal); Seltzer-Bey v. Delo, 66 F.3d 961, 963 (8th Cir.1995) (standard of review for summary judgment). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fegans v. Norris
537 F.3d 897 (Eighth Circuit, 2008)
Holt v. Hobbs
134 S. Ct. 1490 (Supreme Court, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
587 F. App'x 992, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christopher-deaton-v-arkansas-dept-of-correction-ca8-2014.