Christopher Deaton v. Arkansas Dept. of Correction
Opinions
Arkansas prisoner Christopher Deaton appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of his pro se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint asserting violations of his constitutional rights and rights under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Person Act of 2000, 42 U.S.C. § 2000cc et seq. The district court dismissed the complaint partially under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and partially on summary judgment. Upon careful de novo review, we find no basis for reversal. See Cooper v. Schriro, 189 F.3d 781, 783 (8th Cir.1999) (per curiam) (standard of review for § 1915A dismissal); Seltzer-Bey v. Delo, 66 F.3d 961, 963 (8th Cir.1995) (standard of review for summary judgment). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
587 F. App'x 992 (Christopher Deaton v. Arkansas Dept. of Correction) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.