Christopher David Wiest v. Kentucky Bar Association
This text of Christopher David Wiest v. Kentucky Bar Association (Christopher David Wiest v. Kentucky Bar Association) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Kentucky Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TO BE PUBLISHED
2018-SC-000537-KB
CHRISTOPHER DAVID WIEST MOVANT
V. IN SUPREME COURT
KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION RESPONDENT
OPINION AND ORDER
This matter is before the Court upon review of the application of attorney
Christopher David Wiest for reinstatement to the practice of law pursuant to
Supreme Court Rule (SCR) 3.510(3). The Kentucky Bar Association (KBA)
Board of Governors (Board), unanimously recommends approving Wiest’s
application. For the following reasons, we agree with the Board and therefore
approve Wiest’s application for reinstatement to the practice of law in the
Commonwealth of Kentucky.
Factual and Procedural Background
Wiest’s KBA member number is 90725 and his bar roster address is
9380 Montgomery Road, Ste. 202, Cincinnati, Ohio 45242. He was admitted to
practice law in the Commonwealth of Kentucky on May 2, 2005. On December 19, 2016, the Ohio Supreme Court suspended Wiest from
the practice of law in the State of Ohio for a period of two years with the second
year stayed on the condition that Wiest engage in no further misconduct. As
reciprocal discipline, this Court entered an opinion and order on April 27,
2017, suspending Wiest from the practice of law in the Commonwealth of
Kentucky for a period of two years with the second year stayed on the condition
that he engage in no further misconduct. KBA v. Christopher David Wiest, 514
S.W.3d 530 (Ky. 2017). This suspension was to run concurrently with the
suspension previously ordered by the Ohio Supreme Court. Id. Wiest was also
suspended from practice by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of
Ohio, Eastern Division.
Analysis
Wiest’s suspensions in Ohio and Kentucky arise from unlawful securities
trading. More specifically, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
investigated Wiest after it was discovered that he bought and sold stock in a
company, InfoLogix, Inc., (hereafter “InfoLogix”), after being retained to perform
services for Stanley Works, later known as Stanley Black 85 Decker (hereinafter
“Stanley”). Wiest purchased the InfoLogix shares before Stanley publicly
announced the acquisition of InfoLogix. As a result, the SEC filed a cease and
desist order against Wiest on May 13, 2014. Wiest agreed to resolve the SEC
proceedings by paying disgorgement of $56,292.00, prejudgment interest in the
sum of $5,122.97, and civil penalties of $56,292.00 for a total payment of
$117,706.97 to the SEC. On January 19, 2018, the Ohio Supreme Court determined that Wiest
had substantially complied with the December 19, 2016 order of suspension
and reinstated him to the practice of law in the state of Ohio. After his
reinstatement by the Ohio Supreme Court, in January 2018, U.S. District
Court for the Southern District of Ohio also reinstated Wiest to the practice of
law.
During his suspension, Wiest has worked as a paralegal in multiple part-
time positions with supervision by licensed attorneys as permitted by SCR
3.130(5.7(c)). Pursuant to SCR 3.510(3), Wiest filed his Application for
Reinstatement to the KBA on September 29, 2017. To be clear, the charges
arising from the InfoLogix stock trading issue were the sole disciplinary
sanctions he received in Ohio or Kentucky.
The KBA Office of Bar Counsel has certified that there are no pending
disciplinary actions against Wiest as of September 25, 2017. The Character
and Fitness Committee of the KBA Office of Bar Admissions issued an
extensive report, ultimately recommending that Wiest’s application be
approved. On July 17, 2018, Bar Counsel filed a motion recommending that
the Board accept the recommendation of the Character and Fitness Committee.
Wiest has also completed his continuing legal education (CLE) credits, through
the education year ending June 30, 2019.
In August 2018, the Board—with two members recused and one
abstention—voted unanimously to reinstate Wiest to the practice of law in the
Commonwealth of Kentucky. Disposition
We agree with and accordingly accept the Board’s recommendation that
Christopher David Wiest’s Application for Reinstatement to the practice of law
be approved.
It is therefore ORDERED:
1. Christopher David Wiest’s Application for Reinstatement to the
Kentucky Bar Association is approved pursuant to SCR 3.510, subject to
paragraph 2 below.
2. Pursuant to SCR 3.510(1), Wiest is directed to pay all costs associated
with these disciplinary proceedings, in the amount of $549.88. If the KBA
costs exceed the posted bond, Wiest will pay for any additional costs. This
order of reinstatement is contingent upon payment of any outstanding bar
dues, CLE compliance, and payment of the costs in this action.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Christopher David Wiest v. Kentucky Bar Association, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christopher-david-wiest-v-kentucky-bar-association-ky-2018.