Christopher Daniel Cornay v. Lauren Elizabeth Cornay
This text of Christopher Daniel Cornay v. Lauren Elizabeth Cornay (Christopher Daniel Cornay v. Lauren Elizabeth Cornay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed June 1, 2023.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-21-00344-CV
CHRISTOPHER DANIEL CORNAY, Appellant
V.
LAUREN ELIZABETH CORNAY, Appellee
On Appeal from the 280th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2021-29054
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This is an appeal from a protective order signed May 26, 2021. On March 22, 2022, this court granted the parties’ motion to abate the appeal and permit proceedings in the trial court to effectuate the parties’ agreement, particularly to have the trial court grant a joint motion to modify the protective order. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2)(C). The appeal was subsequently reinstated in the absence of any sign that the parties had taken steps to effectuate their agreement. However, on April 25, 2023, the trial court clerk filed a supplemental clerk’s record that included an amended protective order signed February 19, 2023. The amended protective order recites a connection with the trial court’s consideration of the parties’ agreement to modify the original protective order, and moreover, the amended protective order is signed by both parties as well as their respective counsel’s to reflect their approval and consent as to both the form and substance of the amended protective order.
As the parties had not since filed any motion to dismiss the appeal, on April 26, 2023, notification was transmitted to the parties of this court’s intention to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction due to mootness unless any demonstrated this court has jurisdiction over this appeal on or before May 8, 2023. See Tex. R. App. P. 4.1(a), 42.3(a). No party has filed a response.
Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Jewell, Zimmerer, and Hassan.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Christopher Daniel Cornay v. Lauren Elizabeth Cornay, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christopher-daniel-cornay-v-lauren-elizabeth-cornay-texapp-2023.