Christopher Daniel Beltran v. the State of Texas

CourtTexas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
DecidedJune 17, 2026
Docket04-25-00225-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Christopher Daniel Beltran v. the State of Texas (Christopher Daniel Beltran v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Christopher Daniel Beltran v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2026).

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-25-00225-CR

Christopher Daniel BELTRAN, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2019CR9959 Honorable Stephanie R. Boyd, Judge Presiding

Opinion by: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice Lori Massey Brissette, Justice Velia J. Meza, Justice

Delivered and Filed: June 17, 2026

REVERSED AND REMANDED

Appellant, Christopher Daniel Beltran, was indicted on two counts of burglary of a

habitation. TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 30.02. The trial court deferred adjudication and placed

Beltran on community supervision. The order of deferred adjudication required Beltran to

participate in residential treatment at a Substance Abuse Felony Punishment Facility (“SAFPF”).

Beltran served a period at the SAFPF, and then he was released to an aftercare transitional center.

Beltran later relapsed, and the trial court amended his community supervision terms to provide 04-25-00225-CR

that Beltran enter the SAFPF “Relapse” residential treatment program. After Beltran was released

from the SAFPF Relapse program, he was to continue treatment at another aftercare transitional

center. Beltran, however, left the transitional center. The State then moved to adjudicate Beltran’s

guilt and revoke his community supervision.

On March 25, 2025, the trial court signed two judgments adjudicating Beltran guilty of

burglary of a habitation and sentencing him to concurrent terms of imprisonment for ten years.

Each judgment indicates that Beltran is entitled to 977 days of credit, which reflects time that he

had already served while in federal custody. However, neither judgment provides total credit for

the periods that Beltran served at the SAFPF and SAFPF Relapse.

On appeal, Beltran contends that he is entitled to an additional 344 days of credit for the

total time that he served at the SAFPF and SAFPF Relapse. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art.

42A.755(d). 1 The State concedes error. Accordingly, we sustain Beltran’s sole issue. We reverse

and remand this matter to the trial court for it to reform the judgments to include credit for the total

time that Beltran served at the SAFPF and SAFPF Relapse.

Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

DO NOT PUBLISH

1 Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Article 42A.755(d) provides in relevant part:

On revocation, the judge shall credit to the defendant time served as a condition of community supervision in a substance abuse felony punishment facility operated by the Texas Department of Criminal Justice under Section 493.009, Government Code, or other court-ordered residential program or facility, but only if the defendant successfully completes the treatment program in that facility.

TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 42A.755(d).

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Christopher Daniel Beltran v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christopher-daniel-beltran-v-the-state-of-texas-txctapp4-2026.