Christopher Damone Davis v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 10, 2004
Docket06-04-00037-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Christopher Damone Davis v. State (Christopher Damone Davis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Christopher Damone Davis v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion



In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana


______________________________


No. 06-04-00037-CR



CHRISTOPHER DAMONE DAVIS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee




On Appeal from the 124th Judicial District Court

Gregg County, Texas

Trial Court No. 29009-B





Before Morriss, C.J., Ross and Carter, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss



MEMORANDUM OPINION


            Christopher Damone Davis entered a plea of guilty, without a plea agreement, to the indictment charging him with possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver. On January 20, 2004, the trial court rendered judgment against Davis and sentenced him to twenty-five years' confinement. On that same day, after sentencing, Davis signed a waiver of his right to file a motion for new trial and his right of appeal. The trial court's certification of Davis' right of appeal reflects such a waiver.

            A criminal defendant is given the right of appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 25.2. A defendant in a noncapital felony case is also given the right to waive any right secured to him by law. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann art. 1.14 (Vernon Supp. 2004). Since Davis, represented by appointed counsel, signed the waiver of his right of appeal after the trial court pronounced judgment and sentence against him, we treat this as a valid waiver of Davis' right of appeal. See Dorsey v. State, 84 S.W.3d 8, 10 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2002, no pet.). Davis' subsequent notice of appeal does not withdraw or affect his prior waiver. See id.; Ex parte Tabor, 565 S.W.2d 945, 946 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).

            We are without jurisdiction over this matter. Accordingly, we dismiss Davis' appeal.



                                                                        Josh R. Morriss, III

                                                                        Chief Justice


Date Submitted:          March 9, 2004

Date Decided:             March 10, 2004


Do Not Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dorsey v. State
84 S.W.3d 8 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2002)
Ex Parte Tabor
565 S.W.2d 945 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Christopher Damone Davis v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christopher-damone-davis-v-state-texapp-2004.