Christopher D. Eustice v. Paysafe Payment Processing Solutions LLC

Opinion

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________

NO. 09-21-00282-CV __________________

CHRISTOPHER D. EUSTICE, Appellant

V.

PAYSAFE PAYMENT PROCESSING SOLUTIONS LLC, Appellee

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 457th District Court Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 20-03-04135-CV __________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Christopher D. Eustice appealed from a final judgment, signed on September

1, 2021. But after that, Eustice failed to file the brief assigning a claim of error to the

judgment that he appealed. After Eustice failed to meet the deadline for filing his

brief, the Court, through the Clerk, notified him that his brief was past due. The

Court also warned him that we would dismiss his appeal if he failed to file a brief or

asked for an extension of time to do so on or before November 22, 2021. See Tex.

R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1).

1 On December 7, 2021, the Court notified the parties that on December 28,

2021, the Court had submitted the appeal on the record without any briefs. By failing

to comply with the Court’s instructions, Eustice failed to prosecute his appeal. For

the reasons explained above, Eustice’s appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.

See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b); id. 43.2(f).

APPEAL DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Submitted on December 28, 2021 Opinion Delivered January 13, 2022

Before Golemon, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.