Christopher Coutino v. State of Florida
This text of Christopher Coutino v. State of Florida (Christopher Coutino v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
CHRISTOPHER COUTINO, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Petitioner, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
v. CASE NO. 1D14-3958
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondent. ___________________________/
Opinion filed October 6, 2014.
Petition for Writ of Prohibition -- Original Jurisdiction.
Nancy Daniels, Public Defender; Steven L. Seliger and Michael Macnamara, Assistant Public Defenders, Tallahassee, for Petitioner.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of prohibition is denied on the merits.
THOMAS, ROBERTS, and ROWE, JJ., CONCUR.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Christopher Coutino v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christopher-coutino-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2014.