Christopher Charles McIntosh v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 10, 2019·No. 18-3653·Published

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

No. 1D18-3653 _____________________________

CHRISTOPHER CHARLES MCINTOSH,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent. _____________________________

Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel— Original Jurisdiction.

January 10, 2019

PER CURIAM.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits.

WOLF, LEWIS, and WETHERELL, JJ., concur. _____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________

Christopher Charles McIntosh, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Brooke Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Christopher Charles McIntosh v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Christopher Charles McIntosh v. State of Florida (Christopher Charles McIntosh v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.