Christopher Carson v. Castle Nail Spa West 7th, LLC

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided June 13, 2019·No. 02-18-00260-CV·Published

Opinion

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-18-00260-CV ___________________________

CHRISTOPHER CARSON, Appellant

V.

CASTLE NAIL SPA WEST 7TH, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the 352nd District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 352-294509-17

Before Kerr, Pittman and Birdwell, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

On May 13, 2019, we notified appellant that his brief had not been filed as the

appellate rules require. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated that we could dismiss

the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within ten days, appellant filed with the

court an appellant’s brief and an accompanying motion reasonably explaining the

brief’s untimely filing and why an extension was needed. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b),

38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). We have received no response.

Because appellant has failed to file a brief even after we afforded an

opportunity to explain the initial failure, we dismiss the appeal for want of

prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

Per Curiam

Delivered: June 13, 2019

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Christopher Carson v. Castle Nail Spa West 7th, LLC, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

Christopher Carson v. Castle Nail Spa West 7th, LLC (Christopher Carson v. Castle Nail Spa West 7th, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.