CHRISTOPHER C. CIHAK v. TAMMY M. CIHAK

District Court of Appeal of Florida

CHRISTOPHER C. CIHAK v. TAMMY M. CIHAK

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 23, 2019

Docket18-1767

StatusPublished

This text of CHRISTOPHER C. CIHAK v. TAMMY M. CIHAK (CHRISTOPHER C. CIHAK v. TAMMY M. CIHAK) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

CHRISTOPHER C. CIHAK v. TAMMY M. CIHAK, (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

CHRISTOPHER C. CIHAK, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-1767 ) TAMMY M. CIHAK, ) ) Appellee. ) )

Opinion filed January 23, 2019.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.130 from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Chris M. LaBruzzo, Judge.

Charles D. Radeline of Radeline Law Firm, PLC, Palm Harbor, for Appellant.

No appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KHOUZAM, BLACK, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI