Christopher Brown v. Nevada Department of Corrections; Salisheaun Garcia, R.N.

CourtDistrict Court, D. Nevada
DecidedJanuary 13, 2026
Docket3:24-cv-00212
StatusUnknown

This text of Christopher Brown v. Nevada Department of Corrections; Salisheaun Garcia, R.N. (Christopher Brown v. Nevada Department of Corrections; Salisheaun Garcia, R.N.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Christopher Brown v. Nevada Department of Corrections; Salisheaun Garcia, R.N., (D. Nev. 2026).

Opinion

1 KEITH A. WEAVER Nevada Bar No. 10271 2 Keith.Weaver@lewisbrisbois.com ALISSA N. BESTICK 3 Nevada Bar No. 14979 Alissa.Bestick@lewisbrisbois.com 4 6385 S. Rainbow Boulevard, Suite 600 Las Vegas, Nevada 89118 5 Telephone: 702.893.3383 Facsimile: 702.893.3789 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 DISTRICT OF NEVADA, NORTHERN DIVISION 9 10 CHRISTOPHER BROWN, Case No. 3:24-cv-00212-ART-CLB 11 Claimant, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 12 WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL FOR vs. DEFENDANT SALISHEAUN 13 GARCIA, R.N. AND FOR REMOVAL Nevada Department of Corrections, FROM THE CM/ECF SERVICE LIST 14 Respondents. 15 16 / / / 17 / / / 18 / / / 19 / / / 20 / / / 21 / / / 22 / / / 23 / / / 24 / / / 25 / / / 26 / / / 27 / / / 1 Keith A. Weaver (“Attorney Weaver”), Alissa N. Bestick (“Attorney Bestick”), and 2 their law firm Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP (“Lewis Brisbois”) hereby files this 3 Motion to Withdraw as Counsel of Record for Defendant Salisheaun Garcia, R.N. (“Nurse 4 Garcia”) and to be removed the CM/ECF service list for this case pursuant to LR IA 11-6. 5 With this Motion, counsel requests an order from this Honorable Court allowing them and 6 their firm to withdraw as counsel of record for Nurse Garcia, as Nurse Garcia is now 7 represented by the Office of the Attorney General of the State of Nevada. 8 This Motion is based on the following Memorandum of Points and Authorities. the 9 pleadings and papers on file with this Court, and any oral arguments this Honorable Court 10 is willing to entertain at the time of the hearing of this matter. 11 12 DATED this 12th day of January, 2026. 13 14 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP 15 16 By /s/ Alissa Bestick 17 KEITH A. WEAVER Nevada Bar No. 10271 18 ALISSA N. BESTICK 19 Nevada Bar No. 14979 6385 S. Rainbow Boulevard, Suite 600 20 Las Vegas, Nevada 89118 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 1 DECLARATION OF ALISSA N. BESTICK, ESQ. IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL OF RECORD FOR DEFENDANT 2 SALISHEAUN GARCIA, RN AND FOR REMOVAL FROM THE CM/ECF SERVICE LIST 3 4 I, Alissa N. Bestick, Esq., do declare under penalty of perjury that the following is 5 true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief: 6 1. I am an attorney duly licensed to practice in the State of Nevada, and an 7 attorney at the law firm of LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH, LLP, which has been 8 retained to represent the interests of Defendant Salisheaun Garcia, RN. in the matter of 9 Brown v. Nevada Department of Corrections Case No. 3:24-cv-00212-ART-CLB . I 10 have personal knowledge of the content of this Declaration, and I am competent to testify thereto if 11 called upon to do so. 12 2. The facts set forth in this Motion are true and correct to the best of my 13 knowledge, information, and belief. 14 3. Attached as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of the Docket for 15 for 3:24-cv-00212-ART-CLB. 16 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. 17 18 /s/ Alissa N. Bestick 19 Alissa N. Bestick 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 1 MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES 2 I. INTRODUCTION 3 Attorney Weaver, Attorney Bestick, and Lewis Brisbois were retained to represent 4 Nurse Garcia regarding the claims in this case. However, Nurse Garcia has retained the 5 services of the Nevada Office of the Attorney General, who is now actively defending Nurse 6 Garcia in this case. Accordingly, Attorney Weaver, Attorney Bestick, and Lewis Brisbois 7 respectfully request that this Court permit them to withdrawal as counsel of record for Nurse 8 Garcia and remove them from the CM/ECF service list from this case. Nurse Garcia’s 9 interests will be protected, no delay will result, and good cause otherwise exists to permit 10 the requested relief. 11 II. GOOD CAUSE EXISTS TO PERMIT ATTORNEY WEAVER, ATTORNEY BESTICK, AND LEWIS BRISBOIS TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL OF RECORD 12 FOR DEFENDANT SALISHEAUN GARCIA, R.N. , M.D. 13 “[A]n attorney cannot withdraw from a case without consent of the court.” 14 No. 3:19-cv-00598-RCJ-CBC, 2023 WL 6059667, 15 at *3 (D. Nev. Sept. 18, 2023) (quoting 118 F.2d 704, 706 (9th Cir. 16 1941)). Further, “[c]ourts maintain the discretion to grant or deny a motion to withdraw as 17 counsel.” (citation omitted). 18 Rule 11-6 of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada’s Local Rule 19 of Practice states in pertinent part: 20 (b)If an attorney seeks with withdraw after appearing in a case, the attorney 21 must file a motion or stipulation and serve it on the affected client and opposing counsel. The affected client may, but is not required to, file a 22 response to the attorney’s motion within 14 days of the filing of the motion, unless the court orders otherwise. 23 * * * 24 (e) Except for good cause shown, no withdrawal or substitution will be 25 approved if it will result in delay of discovery, the trial, or any hearing in the case. Where delay would result, the papers seeking leave of the court for 26 the withdrawal or substitution must request specific relief from the scheduled discovery, trial, or hearing. If a trial setting has been made, an additional 27 copy of the moving papers must be provided to the clerk for immediate delivery to the assigned district judge, bankruptcy judge, or magistrate 1 LR IA 11-6(b) & (e); 2023 WL 6059667 at *3. 2 In addition, Rule 1.16 of the Nevada Rules of Professional Conduct governs the 3 termination of representation. NRPC 1.16 states in pertinent part: 4 5 (b) Except as stated in paragraph (c), a lawyer may withdraw from representing a client if: 6 (1) Withdrawal can be accomplished without material 7 adverse effect on the interests of the client; 8 * * * 9 . . . or 10 (7)Other good cause for withdrawal exists. 11 (c) A lawyer must comply with applicable law requiring notice to or permission of a tribunal when terminating representation. When ordered to 12 do so by a tribunal, a lawyer shall continue representation notwithstanding good cause for terminating the representation. 13 (d) Upon termination of representation, a lawyer shall take steps to the 14 extent reasonably practicable to protect a client’s interests, such as giving reasonable notice to the client, allowing time for employment of other 15 counsel, surrendering papers and property to which the client is entitled and refunding any advance payment of fee or expense that has not been earned 16 or incurred. The lawyer may retain papers relating to the client to the extent permitted by other law. 17 18 NRCP 1.16(b)(1), (b)(7), (c), & (d). 19 Here, Nurse Garcia, as a present or former State officer, employee, or contractor of 20 the State of Nevada, has obtained Defense Counsel through the Office of the Attorney 21 General of the State of Nevada. Currently, Nurse Garcia is being represented by counsel 22 from the Office of the Attorney General. Exhibit A (indicating that Nurse Garcia is 23 represented by the Office of the Attorney General); ECF No. 104 at p. 1, n.1 24 (wherein all parties and the Magistrate Judge entered a Stipulation and Order stating that 25 “[a]ttorneys D. Randall Gilmer, Esq. and Victoria C. Corey, Esq. of the Attorney General’s 26 Office represent . . . Salisheaun Garcia, R.N. [.]”). 27 Although Attorney Weaver, Attorney Bestick, and Lewis Brisbois are still currently 1 Nurse Garcia’s defense and good cause exists to permit them to withdraw from this case. 2 Pursuant to LR IA 11-6(b), counsel has served this Motion on Nurse Garcia in order to give 3 her the requisite opportunity to respond; however, based on her request for and current 4 representation by the Nevada Office of the Attorney General, counsel anticipates that she 5 will not object to counsel’s request. 6 Although “[w]ithdraw[al] has been denied where the court finds that withdrawal 7 would work an injustice or cause undue delay[,]” no such circumstances exist here. 8 2023 WL 6059667 at *3 (citation and internal quotation marks omitted).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lovvorn v. Johnston
118 F.2d 704 (Ninth Circuit, 1941)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Christopher Brown v. Nevada Department of Corrections; Salisheaun Garcia, R.N., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christopher-brown-v-nevada-department-of-corrections-salisheaun-garcia-nvd-2026.