Christopher Bechara Mouchantaf v. the State of Texas

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: December 2, 2022
• Docket: 07-22-00252-CR
• Status: Published

Opinion

In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07-22-00251-CR No. 07-22-00252-CR

CHRISTOPHER BECHARA MOUCHANTAF, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

On Appeal from the County Court Deaf Smith County, Texas Trial Court Nos. 2021-0282 & 2021-0272, Honorable D.J. Wagner, Presiding

December 2, 2022 ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND Before QUINN, C.J., and DOSS and YARBROUGH, JJ.

Appellant, Christopher Bechara Mouchantaf, appeals his convictions for unlawful

restraint1 and possession of marijuana.2 Appellant represented himself at trial and

represents himself on appeal. The appellate record has been filed and Appellant’s brief

was originally due October 6, 2022. We subsequently granted Appellant an extension to

1 See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 20.02(c). 2 See TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. § 481.121(b)(1). November 7 to file his brief. However, Appellant has not filed a brief or had any further

communication with this Court to date.

When an appellant seeks to represent himself on appeal from a criminal conviction,

an appellate court has discretion to permit self-representation if the appellant can do so

without interfering with the administration of the appellate process. See Scheanette v.

State, 144 S.W.3d 503, 505 n.2 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004) (criminal defendants have no

constitutional right to represent themselves on direct appeal); Bibbs v. State, No. 07-10-

00300-CR, 2011 Tex. App. LEXIS 9490, at *4 (Tex. App.—Amarillo Dec. 2, 2011, order)

(per curiam). Our exercise of that discretion depends on a case-by-case analysis of the

best interest of the appellant, the State, and the proper administration of justice. Id.

Because Appellant, proceeding pro se, has failed to file a brief, we abate the

appeals and remand the causes to the trial court for further proceedings. Upon remand,

the trial court shall conduct a hearing to determine the following:

1. whether Appellant still desires to prosecute the appeals;

2. whether Appellant is indigent and entitled to the appointment of appellate

counsel;

3. whether Appellant still desires to represent himself on appeal;

4. if Appellant desires to represent himself, whether his decision to do so is

competently and intelligently made, including whether he is aware of the

dangers and disadvantages of self-representation on appeal, see Hubbard

v. State, 739 S.W.2d 341, 345 (Tex. Crim. App. 1987); and

2 5. if Appellant desires to represent himself, whether allowing him to do so is in

his best interest, in the best interest of the State, and in furtherance of the

proper administration of justice.

The trial court shall issue findings of fact and conclusions of law addressing the

foregoing subjects. If it is determined that Appellant is entitled to appointed counsel and

that allowing Appellant to represent himself on appeal is not in his best interest or that of

the State or the administration of justice, then the trial court shall appoint appellate

counsel. The name, address, email address, telephone number, and State Bar number

of any newly appointed counsel shall be included in the aforementioned findings.

The trial court shall cause to be developed (1) a clerk’s record containing the

findings and conclusions and (2) a reporter’s record transcribing any evidence and

argument presented at the hearing. The record shall be filed with the Clerk of this Court

on or before January 2, 2023.

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.