Christopher Baker v. Louis Kealoha
679 F. App'x 625
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Christopher Baker v. Louis Kealoha. Read the opinion of the Court — 564 F. App'x 903 →
Opinions
ORDER
The petition for rehearing is granted, our March 20, 2014 memorandum disposition is vacated, the district court’s denial of plaintiffs motion for a preliminary injunction is vacated, and this matter is remanded to' the District Court without prejudice to the District Court granting or denying a preliminary injunction or otherwise considering the case in light of Peruta v. County of San Diego, 824 F.3d 919, 924 (9th Cir. 2016) (en banc), and other intervening Ninth Circuit opinions.
Each side shall bear its own costs.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Christopher Baker v. Louis Kealoha, 679 F. App'x 625 (9th Cir. 2017).
679 F. App'x 625 (Christopher Baker v. Louis Kealoha) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Stefanelli v. Minard
342 U.S. 117 (Supreme Court, 1951)
Rizzo v. Goode
423 U.S. 362 (Supreme Court, 1976)
District of Columbia v. Heller
554 U.S. 570 (Supreme Court, 2008)
Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.
555 U.S. 7 (Supreme Court, 2008)
McDonald v. City of Chicago
561 U.S. 742 (Supreme Court, 2010)
John W. Madsen v. Boise State University
976 F.2d 1219 (Ninth Circuit, 1992)
Friery v. Los Angeles Unified School District
448 F.3d 1146 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)
Americans for Prosperity Found v. Kamala Harris
809 F.3d 536 (Ninth Circuit, 2015)
Edward Peruta v. County of San Diego
824 F.3d 919 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)
Taniguchi v. Schultz
303 F.3d 950 (Ninth Circuit, 2002)