Christopher Augustine Gabel v. Sekara Ortega Gabel
This text of Christopher Augustine Gabel v. Sekara Ortega Gabel (Christopher Augustine Gabel v. Sekara Ortega Gabel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued June 27, 2024
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-24-00006-CV ——————————— CHRISTOPHER GABEL, Appellant V. SEKARA GABEL, Appellee
On Appeal from 257th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2018-67980
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant Christopher Gabel has neither established indigence for purposes
of court costs nor paid, or made arrangements to pay, the fee for preparing the clerk’s
record. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 145; TEX. R. APP. P. 34.1. We notified Appellant that
his appeal could be dismissed for want of prosecution if the clerk’s record was not filed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(a), (b). We directed Appellant to submit written
evidence from the trial court clerk by June 6, 2024, reflecting he paid, or made
arrangements to pay, the fee for preparing the clerk’s record. To date, Appellant has
not responded to this Court’s notice and the clerk’s record has not been filed.
We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b),
42.3(b)–(c). We dismiss any pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Hightower, Rivas-Molloy, and Farris.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Christopher Augustine Gabel v. Sekara Ortega Gabel, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christopher-augustine-gabel-v-sekara-ortega-gabel-texapp-2024.