CHRISTOPHER ADKINS and MISTY ADKINS v. ROY KATZIN, M.D.
This text of CHRISTOPHER ADKINS and MISTY ADKINS v. ROY KATZIN, M.D. (CHRISTOPHER ADKINS and MISTY ADKINS v. ROY KATZIN, M.D.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
CHRISTOPHER ADKINS and MISTY ADKINS, Appellants,
v.
ROY KATZIN, M.D., SPECIALISTS ON CALL, INC., a Foreign Profit Corporation, TELE-PHYSICIANS, P.C., a Georgia Professional Corporation and Foreign Profit Corporation d/b/a SPECIALISTS ON CALL PHYSICIANS and d/b/a FLORIDA TELE-PHYSICIANS, SPECIALISTS ON CALL PHYSICIANS CORPORATION, a Foreign Profit Corporation, and NAPLES HMA, LLC d/b/a PHYSICIANS REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, Appellees.
No. 4D20-2271
[April 1, 2021]
Appeal of a nonfinal order from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; James L. Martz, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2018-CA-011468-XXXX-MB.
Robert C. Hubbard and George A. Vaka of Vaka Law Group, P.L., Tampa, for appellants.
Michael R. D'Lugo of Wicker, Smith, O'Hara, McCoy & Ford, P.A., Orlando, for appellee Naples HMA, Inc. d/b/a Physicians Regional Medical Center.
Ilisa W. Hoffman and Kelly A. Fernandes of Hoffman Law Group, P.A., Coral Gables, for appellees Roy Katzin, M.D., Specialists On Call, Inc., and Specialists On Call Physicians Corporation.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
LEVINE, C.J., CIKLIN and FORST, JJ., concur.
* * * Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
CHRISTOPHER ADKINS and MISTY ADKINS v. ROY KATZIN, M.D., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christopher-adkins-and-misty-adkins-v-roy-katzin-md-fladistctapp-2021.